BREAKING NEWS

Welcome to AGUMA Online

Monday, 18 March 2019

Bgr | MySpace accidentally deleted every song, photo, and video uploaded before 2016 || AGUMA.ONLINE

MySpace

Before Facebook dominated the social networking landscape, there was MySpace. Remember Tom? Remember having a list of your top 8 friends? Remember obnoxious personal pages with flashing lights, auto-playing music, and a seemingly endless stream of quizzes? It seems like a lifetime ago, but there was a period of time back in the mid-2000s when MySpace was the world's largest and most popular social network.

Famously, MySpace quickly became irrelevant once Facebook decided to allow non-students to join back in 2006. MySpace's demise can also be traced back to a number of questionable product decisions from the company's higher-ups. As a prime example, Facebook offered users a clean and straight forward interface while MySpace decided to stick with a design principle that can properly be categorized as anarchy. All that said, you may have completely forgotten that MySpace is still around, though the site these days is more of a music-oriented entity than anything else.

Now that we've taken a nice stroll down memory lane, there's actually some interesting news about MySpace today. As it turns out, the company recently posted a message on the site relaying that all media uploaded to the site from 2003 through 2015 was inadvertently lost during a server migration project. It's almost poetic, in a way. The site no one remembers just lost an avalanche of data most people don't remember even uploading.

MySpace's statement on the matter reads:

As a result of a server migration project, any photos, videos, and audio files you uploaded more than three years ago may no longer be available on or from MySpace. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Again, I can't imagine anyone even remembering what type of photos or video they uploaded to the site way back when, but suffice it to say, it's completely gone now. Per the tweet below, MySpace notes that "there is no way to recover the lost data."

It's an odd story, to be sure, and some folks are naturally skeptical of MySpace's official position on the matter.



Arstechnica | Google Project Zero, Microsoft collaborate for 12 months to find new kind of Windows bug || AGUMA.ONLINE

Google Project Zero, Microsoft collaborate for 12 months to find new kind of Windows bug

Enlarge (credit: Marco Verch / Flickr)

One of the more notable features of Google Project Zero's (GPZ) security research has been its 90-day disclosure policy. In general, vendors are given 90 days to address issues found by GPZ, after which the flaws will be publicly disclosed. But sometimes understanding a flaw and developing fixes for it takes longer than 90 days�sometimes, much longer, such as when a new class of vulnerability is found. That's what happened last year with the Spectre and Meltdown processor issues, and it's happened again with a new Windows issue.

Google researcher James Forshaw first grasped that there might be a problem a couple of years ago when he was investigating the exploitability of another Windows issue published three years ago. In so doing, he discovered the complicated way in which Windows performs permissions checks when opening files or other secured objects. A closer look at the involved parts showed that there were all the basic elements to create a significant elevation of privilege attack, enabling any user program to open any file on the system, regardless of whether the user should have permission to do so. The big question was, could these elements be assembled in just the right way to cause a problem, or would good fortune render the issue merely theoretical?

The basic rule is simple enough: when a request to open a file is being made from user mode, the system should check that the user running the application that's trying to open the file has permission to access the file. The system does this by examining the file's access control list (ACL) and comparing it to the user's user ID and group memberships. However, if the request is being made from kernel mode, the permissions checks should be skipped. That's because the kernel in general needs free and unfettered access to every file.

Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments



Macrumors | 2019 10.5-Inch iPad Air vs. 2017 10.5-Inch iPad Pro || AGUMA.ONLINE

Apple has launched a new 10.5-inch iPad Air that can be viewed as a lower-priced successor to the second-generation 10.5-inch iPad Pro, which has been discontinued. Below, we compare tech specs and features.


Pricing is key, with the new iPad Air starting at $499 with Wi-Fi only and $629 with LTE connectivity in the United States. The 10.5-inch iPad Pro started at $649 with Wi-Fi and $779 with LTE connectivity until it was discontinued. Both have 64GB or 256GB of storage, but the new iPad Air lacks a 512GB option.

Design wise, the iPads have a lot of similarities, including dimensions, thinness, and overall appearance. Both have a Touch ID home button, a headphone jack, and a Lightning connector, but the new iPad Air has only two speakers along the bottom, whereas the 10.5-inch iPad Pro has four speakers.

The new iPad Air is available in Silver, Space Gray, and a newer Gold finish that essentially merges the previously separate Gold and Rose Gold finishes that were available for the 10.5-inch iPad Pro.

Both iPads feature a fully laminated Retina display with a resolution of 2224�1668 pixels and 264 PPI, True Tone, and support for the P3 wide color space, but the new 10.5-inch iPad Air has a 60Hz refresh rate while the 10.5-inch iPad Pro has a so-called ProMotion display with up to a 120Hz refresh rate.

Processor wise, the new iPad Air sports Apple's A12 Bionic chip compared to a slower A10X Fusion chip in the 10.5-inch iPad Pro. The new iPad Air also has dedicated hardware called the "Neural Engine" that handles artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, while the 10.5-inch iPad Pro does not.

In terms of battery life, both iPads last up to 10 hours per charge, according to Apple's internal testing.

With its lower price point, the new iPad Air has a lower-end 8-megapixel rear camera, compared to a 12-megapixel sensor on the 10.5-inch iPad Pro. The rear camera on the new iPad Air also lacks LED flash, optical image stabilization, and Focus Pixels, but one benefit is that there is no camera bump.

The front FaceTime HD cameras are the same 7-megapixel sensors with Live Photos, Retina Flash, and other identical features on both iPads.

As for connectivity, both iPads have 802.11ac Wi-Fi, but the new iPad Air has Gigabit-class LTE versus the 10.5-inch iPad Pro's theoretically slower LTE Advanced support. The new iPad Air also gets a bump to Bluetooth 5.0 versus Bluetooth 4.2 out of the box for the 10.5-inch iPad Pro.

Summary

  • The new iPad Air starts at $150 less than the 10.5-inch iPad Pro and thus has some tradeoffs: two speakers versus four, no ProMotion display, and a lower-end 8-megapixel rear camera with no LED flash or optical image stabilization.
  • Both iPads have a 10.5-inch Retina display with 264 PPI, headphone jack, Touch ID, Lightning connector, 7-megapixel front camera, up to 10 hours of battery life, and 802.11ac Wi-Fi.
  • The new iPad Air has some advantages: faster A12 Bionic chip vs. A10X Fusion, Gigabit-class LTE vs. LTE Advanced, and Bluetooth 5.0 vs 4.2.
The new iPad Air can be ordered starting today with in-store availability beginning next week in the United States and many other regions.

Related Roundup: iPad Air

This article, "2019 10.5-Inch iPad Air vs. 2017 10.5-Inch iPad Pro" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums



ANDROID ROOMhority | Do you own a smartwatch, fitness tracker, or other wearable? (Poll of the Week) || AGUMA.ONLINE

Last week's poll summary: Last week, we asked you if you were installing the Android Q developer preview. Out of almost 850 total votes, 37 percent of voters said they weren't planning on installing the Android Q beta. 34 percent of voters said they've already installed it, while 30 percent of voters are still on the fence.


We write about smartwatches, fitness trackers, and all other types of wearables here at Android Authority.

Wear OS has a strong list of contenders, with many companies still developing smartwatches powered by Google's wearable OS. Even though the platform itself could use some work, there are still plenty of reasons you'd want to buy a Wear OS-powered watch.

Others shouldn't be overlooked, though. Fitbit makes some great smartwatches, and Samsung's new Galaxy Watch Active looks very promising.

For as popular as they've become, smartwatches aren't for everyone, which is why fitness trackers and hybrid smartwatches have become so popular over the years. Less functionality means fewer distractions throughout your day, and these devices are generally smaller than traditional smartwatches.

We asked this question nearly three years ago, but it's time to revisit the idea: Do you own a smartwatch, fitness tracker, or another wearable? If so, which one, and how often do you wear it? Cast your vote in the poll below, and be sure to speak up in the comments!

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Imore | 9.7-inch iPad vs 10.5-inch iPad Air: Which should you buy? || AGUMA.ONLINE

We're a virtual company made up of tech experts from across the globe. We live and breathe iPads for our daily use, and have tested nearly every one to find the best picks for you. With Apple's newest iPad offerings, which one should you pick up?

10.5-inch iPad Air (2019)

Better features, bigger size

Starting from $499 at Apple

Pros

  • Larger 10.5-inch screen
  • A12 bionic chip
  • Storage up to 256GB
  • True Tone display
  • Has Smart Connector

Cons

  • Still uses Touch ID
  • Only supports first-generation Apple Pencil

The new iPad Air (2019) is a great choice if you're looking for an affordable iPad. The larger screen means you can see more at once, the A12 bionic chip gives you faster processing speeds than its predecessor, and the True Tone display equates to color accuracy in ambient light. The Smart Connector also lets you use accessories like the Smart Keyboard, and having larger storage capacity is always a plus. Unfortunately, it still doesn't have Face ID and can only use the first-generation Apple Pencil.

9.7-inch iPad (2018)

Great budget pick

Starting from $250 at Amazon

Pros

  • Very affordable
  • 9.7-inch screen is not too small or too big
  • Supports first-generation Apple Pencil
  • A10 Fusion chip is still fairly capable

Cons

  • Still uses Touch ID
  • Lack of True Tone
  • Only up to 128GB storage
  • Front camera is a measly 1.2MP

If you're on a budget, the 9.7-inch iPad (2018) is still a decent option. The screen is not too small or too large, it supports the first generation Apple Pencil, and the A10 Fusion chip is plenty capable of everyday tasks. But if you want the bells and whistles like True Tone, more storage, a more powerful processor for resource-intensive apps and games, then another iPad may be a better fit.

Both the 9.7-inch iPad (2018) and 10.5-inch iPad Air (2019) are affordable options if you can't go for the more expensive iPad Pro, but the new iPad Air is definitely the better pick of the two right now.

Let's break it down

Even though you may find the 9.7-inch iPad (2018) more enticing due to the lower price tag, the new 10.5-inch iPad Air (2019) is definitely the better buy. You're getting a ton more features, and the price difference between the two is not that big.

iPad Air (2019) iPad (2018)
Cost From $499 and up From $329 and up
Wi-Fi only Yes Yes
Wi-Fi + Cellular Yes Yes
Screen size 10.5-inch 9.7-inch
Dimensions 9.8-by-6.8-by-0.24 inches 9.4-by-6.6-by-0.29 inches
Weight 1 pound 1.03 pounds
Storage 64GB or 256GB 32GB or 128GB
Display Retina Retina
Resolution 2224-by-1668 2048-by-1536
Laminated display Yes No
Antireflective coating Yes No
True Tone Yes No
Chip A12 Bionic A10 Fusion
Apple Pencil First-generation only First-generation only
Smart Connector Yes No
Back camera 8MP 8MP
Front camera 7MP 1.2MP
Audio Two speakers Two speakers
Face ID No No
Touch ID Yes Yes

As you can see, while they both look similar in some aspects, the iPad Air (2019) is far superior.

With the new iPad Air (2019), you're getting an upgraded 10.5-inch screen. That means you can see more on the tablet at once, which is always a plus when reading, writing, or drawing. That also means it's easier to watch video or edit photos on-the-go. It may not seem like a huge jump from the previous 9.7-inch screen, but it really helps when you need it to.

The A12 Bionic chip also means that the new iPad Air (2019) is much faster than the iPad (2018), and it should be able to handle more resource-intensive apps and games. And when you're multitasking with split screens, the iPad Air is far more capable of handling whatever you can throw at it.

iPad Air (2019) also has more storage capacity than the iPad (2018). This means that you get 64GB and 256GB options, instead of 32GB and 128GB with the iPad (2018). We believe that having more storage capacity on a device like the iPad is always a good thing, especially if you plan on putting a lot of media or files on it.

True Tone was first introduced on the iPad Pro in 2016, and it has made its way onto most iOS devices ever since. The iPad Air (2019) now has True Tone, and it provides users with color accuracy in ambient light. It's dynamic, and adjusts the temperature, intensity, and percentage of white light on the display depending on your current environment. The end result is a display that appears and feels more natural, and has less strain on your eyes. Having this feature on the iPad Air (2019) is a nice addition.

Apple also first introduced the Smart Connector in the iPad Pro. The Smart Connector is a port on the left side of an iPad that provides power and a data connection to certain accessories. With the iPad Air (2019), there is now a Smart Connector, making it the first non-Pro iPad to have it. This means you can use Apple's Smart Keyboard, which does not have a battery and can receive updates through the iPad.

And finally, while the iPad Air (2019) and iPad (2018) both have the same rear-camera specs, there's a big difference with the front-facing cameras. The iPad (2018) only has a measly 1.2MP front-facing camera and can only do HD video up to 720p. The iPad Air (2019), however, has an impressive 7MP front camera and can do 1080p HD video.

Who should buy the 10.5-inch iPad Air (2019)?

Anyone who is looking to get a powerful but lightweight iPad that isn't too big or too expensive should consider the iPad Air (2019). The 10.5-inch screen is smaller than the iPad Pro options, but it's still very capable in terms of features and should be good enough for most people. Plus, the price is still considerably less than the iPad Pro, even with a maxed out Wi-Fi + Cellular version.

Who should buy the 9.7-inch iPad (2018)?

If you're on a tight budget, don't care about having the fastest processor, think 9.7-inches is plenty of screen estate, don't do video calls often, don't need a lot of storage, and dislike True Tone (not everyone has to be a fan), then the iPad (2018) should be fine. You can also find it on sale for much lower than the regular price on sites like Amazon from time to time.

10.5-inch iPad Air (2019)

Our pick

Starting from $499 at Apple

A good option just got better

The new iPad Air (2019) is a nice improvement over the previous generations. The 10.5-inch screen means you can see and do more at once, True Tone is less harsh on the eyes, the Smart Connector means more options for accessories, and you get more higher storage capacities. And there is still support for the first-generation Apple Pencil, and a nice 7MP front-facing camera with 1080p HD video. Perhaps Face ID can come next year.

9.7-inch iPad (2018)

Budget pick

When you just want the basics

Starting from $250 at Amazon

If you just want a basic iPad and don't need the fancy bells and whistles and don't need a ton of storage, the iPad (2018) is a good option. It also goes on sale from time to time at retailers like Amazon, so you can even pick it up for super cheap if you catch it at the right time.



Imore | PlayStation Vue adds four-stream multiview for Apple TV || AGUMA.ONLINE

The PS4 app gets a few tweaks, too.

PlayStation Vue today announced that it's updating its Apple TV app to support multiview � meaning you'll be able to watch up to four live channels at one time on a single screen. (Just in time for March Madness, no doubt.) The feature previously has been available on PlayStation 4, though it is limited to just three streams at a time.

The PS Vue app also is getting an update on PS4. Here's what's up:

Additionally, the multi-view feature on PS4, which offers up to three live channels at once, is receiving two updates today. The first update is real-time program changing, which means you will no longer have to start from the beginning each time you want to add in a different program. The second update is new filters � now Sports and News have their own dedicated tabs, which makes it even easier for you to find sports and news for multi-view.

PlayStation Vue is available on nearly every piece of hardware you can think of. (Except for Xbox, because Sony and Microsoft aren't quite holding hands yet.) Its plans start at $45 a month and range up to $80 a month, with premium add-ons available. Local channels come standard.



Theverge | Warner Bros. chairman and CEO Kevin Tsujihara is out amid allegations || AGUMA.ONLINE

For a moment, it seemed like Warner Bros. boss Kevin Tsujihara might have been in the clear � despite allegations that he'd had an extramarital affair with one of the studio's actresses, his new corporate overlords at AT&T saw fit to promote him to head up all of the children's programming at the newly minted WarnerMedia.

But now, Tsujihara is out � and both he and WarnerMedia are making it sound like it was his idea.

"It is in the best interest of WarnerMedia, Warner Bros., our employees and our partners for Kevin to step down," reads part of a statement from WarnerMedia CEO John Stankey, which The Verge and other publications received by email. "Kevin acknowledges that his mistakes are inconsistent with the Company's leadership expectations and could impact the Company's ability to execute going forward," it continues.

A personal note from Tsujihara echoes those comments, adding that "it has been clear that my continued leadership could be a distraction and an obstacle to the company's continued success."

WarnerMedia says it hasn't named a successor for Tsujihara just yet, and is still completing its investigation into the allegations against him.

Tsujihara isn't the only head that's rolled following AT&T attempts to restructure its new media empire; HBO chairman and CEO Richard Plepler, who greenlit Game of Thrones among his other moves to shore up prestige television, was ousted in late February.



 
Copyright © 2014 For You

Powered by JoJoThemes